Netizen 24 IND: Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answered

Diposting oleh On 03.05

Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answered

  • Home
  • India
  • Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answered
Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answered

Section 377 criminalises sexual acts 'against the order of nature' and has undergone many twists and turns ever since the Delhi High Court decriminalised it in 2009

supreme court to review section 377supreme court to review section 377 With the apex court deciding to revisit its decis ion on Section 377 on Monday, there is a renewed hope among the members of the LGBT community. (File Photo) Related News
  • Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€
    Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€" A timeline of the case
  • Section 377: Supreme Court to revisit 2013 judgment, refers matter to larger benchSection 377: Supreme Court to revisit 2013 judgment, refers matter to larger bench
    Section 377: Supreme Court to revisit 2013 judgment, refers matter to larger bench
  • Supreme Court says J&K anti-graft chief can’t be arbitrator, he readies an appealSupreme Court says J&K anti-graft chief can’t be arbitrator, he readies an appeal
    Supreme Court says J&K anti-graft chief can’t be arbitrator, he readies an appeal

Section 377 criminalises sexual acts “against the order of nature” and has undergone many twists and turns ever since the Delhi High Court decriminalised it in 2009. Later, in 2012, the Supreme Court overturned the decision. But, with the apex court deciding to revisit its decision on Monday, there is a renewed hope among the members of the LGBT community.

1) What is Section 377?

Section 377 of IPC â€" which came into force in 1862 â€" defines unnatural of fences. It says, “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.” Moreover, the law also mentions that “penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section”.

ALSO READ: Section 377: Supreme Court to revisit 2013 judgment, refers matter to larger bench

2) What was the High Court ruling on Section 377 in 2009?

Following a PIL by Delhi-based Naz Foundation, an NGO fighting for gay rights, the Delhi HC on July 3, 2009, struck down Section 377 of the IPC, holding that it violated the fundamental rights of life and liberty and the right to equality as guaranteed in the Constitution. “Section 377 of the IPC, in so far as it criminalises consensual se xual acts of adults in private, is violative of Articles 21 (Right to Protection of Life and Personal Liberty), Article 14 (Right to equality before law) and Article 15 (Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth] of the Constitution,” a division bench of Justice A P Shah and Justice S Muralidhar said in a 105-page order.

The HC held that the Section 377 denied dignity to an individual and criminalised their core identity on the basis of their sexuality adding that it also violated Article 14 by targeting homosexuals as a class.

RELATED REPORT: Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€" A timeline of the case

3) Why did the Supreme Court reverse the High Court verdict?

The Supreme Court reversed the HC verdict in December 2013 and upheld the constitutional validity of Section 377 of IPC, while giving the power to the legislature to formulate a law on homosexuality. The judgment s aid, “We hold that Section 377 does not suffer from the vice of unconstitutionality and the declaration made by the division bench of the High Court is legally unsustainable.” Justice GS Singhvi and Justice S J Mukhopadhaya, who pronounced the verdict, justified its order by saying, “The High Court overlooked that a minuscule fraction of the country’s population constitute lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgenders and in last more than 150 years, less than 200 persons have been prosecuted for committing offence under Section 377.”

4) How will the Right to Privacy judgment affect Section 377?

In August 2017, the Supreme Court, in a landmark verdict, declared right to privacy a fundamental right, ushering in hope for the gay and LGBT community. The apex court had concluded that privacy included at its core the preservation of personal intimacies and that sexual orientation was an essential attribute of privacy. “Discrimination against an indi vidual on the basis of sexual orientation is deeply offensive to the dignity and self-worth of the individual. Equality demands that the sexual orientation of each individual in society must be protected on an even platform. The right to privacy and the protection of sexual orientation lie at the core of the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution,” the SC held. The SC decision will definitely strengthen arguments for decriminalisation of homosexuality.

5) What is the present situation?

On Monday, a three-judge bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra decided to re-examine the constitutional validity of Section 377 and said the matter would be referred to a larger bench. “A section of people or individuals who exercise their choice should never remain in a state of fear. Choice can’t be allowed to cross boundaries of law but confines of law can’t trample or curtail the inherent right embedded in an individual under Ar t 21 of Constitution,” the bench observed.

The court also issued a notice to the Centre seeking its response to a writ petition filed by five members of the LGBT community. The petitioners said they live in constant fear of police action because of their sexual preferences.

6) What was the Supreme Court verdict on transgenders?

In the April 2014 verdict, hailed by gender rights activists, the apex court directed the government to declare transgenders a ‘third gender’ along with male and female. It also asked the Centre to include them in the OBC quota. Underlining the need to bring them into the mainstream, the verdict by a bench of Justices KS Radhakrishnan and AK Sikri said transgenders should have all rights under the law, including marriage, adoption, divorce, succession, and inheritance.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd More Related News
  • Constitution bench to decide plea on adultery law change
    Constitution bench to decide plea on adultery law change
  • Court is not super guardian of adult offspring, says Supreme Court
    Court is not super guardian of adult offspring, says Supreme Court
Most Read
  • FIR against Tribune reporter over Aadhaar data breach storyFIR against Tribune reporter over Aadhaar data breach story
  • Padmavat gets a release date, set to clash with Akshay Kumar's PadMan on January 25Padmavat gets a release date, set to clash with Akshay Kumar's PadMan on January 25
  • Photos: Anushka Sharma is back to work, gets a floral welcome on the sets of ZeroPhotos: Anushka Sharma is back to work, gets a floral welcome on the sets of Zero
  • India vs South Africa Live Cricket Score and Updates, 1st Test, Day 4: South Africa bowled out for 130, set India 208-run targetIndia vs South Africa Live Cricket Score and Updates, 1st Test, Day 4: South Africa bowled out for 130, set India 208-run target
Best of Express
  • Padmavat gets a release date, set to clash with Akshay Kumar's Padman on January 25EntertainmentPadmavat gets a release date, set to clash with Akshay Kumar's Padman on January 25
  • Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answeredSupreme Court to review Section 377: Al l your questions answered
  • Gandhi assassination case: Amicus curiae files report, says no need for reprobeGandhi assassination case: Amicus curiae files report, says no need for reprobe
  • Bhima Koregaon is where three political projects of our times clash even as they try to collude with each other OpinionBhima Koregaon is where three political projects of our times clash even as they try to collude with each other
  • Rajinikanth offers no alternative. Politics of patronage and populism looks set to continueOpinionRajinikanth offers no alternative. Politics of patronage and populism looks set to continue
Buzzing Now
  • Photos: Anushka Sharma is back to work, gets a floral welcome on the sets of ZeroEntertainmentPhotos: Anushka Sharma is back to work, gets a floral welcome on the sets of Zero
  • 2018 Golden Globe Awards highlights: Oprah, Three Billboards triumph at black-draped functionEntertainment2018 Golde n Globe Awards highlights: Oprah, Three Billboards triumph at black-draped function
  • Bigg Boss 11 evicted contestant Luv Tyagi: Vikas made me look like a fool and I wanted to prove him wrongEntertainmentBigg Boss 11 evicted contestant Luv Tyagi: Vikas made me look like a fool and I wanted to prove him wrong
  • Woman posts screenshot of her conversation with a POLITE man, asks others to follow in his footstepsTrendingWoman posts screenshot of her conversation with a POLITE man, asks others to follow in his footsteps
  • Google Do   odle celebrates Fearless Nadia on her 110th birth anniversaryTrendingGoogle Doodle celebrates Fearless Nadia on her 110th birth anniversary
Top News
  • Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€Section 377 to be revisited by SC â€" A timeline of the case
  • The military women and the fight to be equalThe military women and the fight to be equal
  • CAT 2017: Two female candidates, three non-engineers among top 20 scorersCAT 2017: Two female candidates, three non-engineers among top 20 scorers
  • Fire breaks out at Gorakhpur's Baba Raghav Das Medical CollegeFire breaks out at Gorakhpur's Baba Raghav Das Medical College
  • India vs South Africa, Live Cricket ScoreSportsIndia vs South Africa, Live Cricket Score
  • Australia romp to innings win and 4-0 Ashes triumphSportsAustralia romp to innings win and 4-0 Ashes triumph
  • Golden Globe Awards 2018 red carpet is a sea of blackGolden Globe Awards 2018 red carpet is a sea of black
  • Golden Globe 2018: Stars say 'Time's Up' wearing black on the red carpetLifestyleGolden Globe 2018: Stars say 'Time's Up' wearing black on the red carpet
  • Reliance Jio vs Airtel vs Vodafone: Best recharge offers in Rs 500 price range for data, extra validityTechnologyReliance Jio vs Airtel vs Vodafone: Best recharge offers in Rs 500 price range for data, extra validity
  • Honor View 10 review: Mid-range flagship for Rs 29,999, ticks all the right boxesTechnologyHonor View 10 review: Mid-range flagship for Rs 29,999, ticks all the right boxes
Jan 08: Latest News
  • NGT directs Haryana to submit action plan on waste management
  • I have got better at controlling my emotions: Sumit Nagal
  • TRAI’s views on ICT solutions for differently-abled by June
  • Supreme Court to review Section 377: All your questions answered
  • #TimesUp, #WhyWeWearBlack: Hashtags that defined Golden Globes 2018
  • Read Next
  • #TimesUp, #WhyWeWearBlack: Hashtags that defined Golden Globes 2018
  • Railways to deploy drones to monitor projects
  • Netflix propels TV production, dethrones HBO with critics
Source: Google News

Next
« Prev Post
Previous
Next Post »