Netizen 24 IND: War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8

War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8 Home India War of words in Supreme ...

War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8

  • Home
  • India
  • War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8
War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8

Though Kapil Sibal did not mention elections, it was apparent to all present that he wanted the court to hear the matter only after the 2019 elections to Lok Sabha.

Ayodhya hearing on February 8Ayodhya hearing on February 8 The court finally agreed to give the parties time until February 8. (Express file photo) Related News
  • Mumbai riots 1992: 25 years on, some have given up, some still hope for justiceMumbai riots 1992: 25 years on, some have given up, some still hope for justice
    Mumbai riots 1992: 25 years on, some have given up, some still hope for justice
  • Mumbai riots 1992: Srikrishna Commission report and action takenMumbai riots 1992: Srikrishna Commission report and action taken
    Mumbai riots 1992: Srikrishna Commission report and action taken
  • Bijnor: PFI members booked over posters with Hindi, Urdu slogans on Babri demolitionBijnor: PFI members booked over posters with Hindi, Urdu slogans on Babri demolition
    Bijnor: PFI members booked over posters with Hindi, Urdu slogans on Babri demolition

THE MUCH-AWAITED hearing in the Supreme Court on the Ayodhya lawsuit over the title to the disputed Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site turned into a political slugfest Tuesday with lawyers for Muslim appellants questioning the “hurry” to hear the matter now and demanding that it be referred to a Constitution Bench and the hearing be put off till July 2019.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Wakf Board, told a bench of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer: “Why was it not heard earlier? Why suddenly now? …Thi s is perhaps the most important litigation in the history of India because it will decide the country’s future… It has serious ramifications… So send it to five or seven judges… Please hear the case which has ramifications on polity of India… for July 2019.”

Though Sibal did not mention elections, it was apparent to all present that he wanted the court to hear the matter only after the 2019 elections to Lok Sabha. The court, however, rejected the request and fixed February 8 for the next hearing. “We are sure the learned counsel for the parties will come prepared to argue the matter and shall not seek any adjournment,” the bench said, while asking them to finish pending paperwork.

Earlier, Sibal told the court he was “also aggrieved by the fact that a person who is not a party mentions it (the case) and it is listed”. He did not take any name but it was a reference to BJP leader Subramanian Swamy who had mentioned the matter in July for early hea ring before a bench headed by then Chief Justice of India J S Khehar.

Swamy had told the court then that he had been allowed to intervene in the case and urged it to the hear the matter at the earliest, saying the appeals â€" against the Allahabad High Court verdict of September 2010 which had split the disputed site among three parties â€" had been pending for the last seven years. The bench had not given him any commitment but had said that it “will take a decision on it”.

Also Read | How different was that sundown, 25 years ago, in Ayodhya

The wait outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Experss Photo/Tashi Tobgyal)

Imputing political motives to Swamy’s request, Sibal referred to a letter written to the Prime Minister on efforts being made to expedite the hearin g and said that construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya was part of the BJP’s election manifesto.

“Why should the court fall into this trap?… Somebody is pushing the party manifesto,” he said. This drew protests from senior advocate Harish Salve who appeared for one of the Hindu parties in the suit. “Yes, title suits sometimes have consequences outside the court, but I don’t think the court should be concerned about that… It is disturbing… They are presuming which way the court will decide… Why all this talk of what will happen to secularism?”

“Do we know what will the court decide?… Supreme Court should decide on the legality of the High Court order, not on the basis of repercussions it would cause… The very fact that they have asked for date of July 2019 is reason enough why the court should start hearing today itself… They are giving a very wrong message… That will mean this court has an eye on what is going to happen,” Salve said. Justice Bhushan, too, objected to Sibal’s submission, and said, “You are going back on what you said earlier. You had said take it up in January, now you say July 2019.”

Sibal repeated, “Yes, I am saying so, and I say it with passion.” At this, Justice Bhushan said, “You are making it non-serious.”

Also Read | Babri demolition 25 years later: How High Court saw answer in split verdict

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing a Muslim appellant, said the matter was not just about a title suit but something that touched the very basis of secularism. He cited a 1994 case decided by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. He said the judgment stated that a mosque was not integral to Islam and that prayers could be offered anywhere. “So mosques across the world are irrelevant?… It is not just insulting, but also binding on you (the Bench),” he said. “At the root of the question is the mosque… They say mosque is not neede d… Mosque is a part of Islam,” Dhavan said, adding that since it was decided by a Constitution Bench, only a larger Bench would be able to examine that.

Sibal and Dhavan also sought more time to prepare arguments in the matter, saying all documents relied upon by the other side before the High Court had not been given to them. Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta described this as “incorrect” and said all relevant documents had been submitted. CJI Misra said he had not fixed Tuesday’s date to begin arguments but only to hear what was the case of each side before the High Court.

He then asked senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, who was representing a Hindu party, to make his case statement. Protesting, Dhavan said the counsel for appellants had “objections” to the “procedure” being adopted by the court and sought permission to leave the hearing. “Excuse us,” he said, as co-counsels, Dushyant Dave and Sibal, too stood up to leave. Intervening, CJ I Misra said “Mr Sibal, you should not be doing this.”

Later in its order, the court referred to this turn of events and said the senior advocates seeking leave to recuse themselves “was shocking and surprising and when we proceeded to record so, prayer was made not to do so and we, accepting the fervent request made by the counsel, refrain from doing so”.

Dave repeated the charge that Swamy had mentioned the matter only because it was in the election manifesto (of the BJP). “I request the other side to agree to refer this matter to a Constitution Bench,” Dave said. But Salve said, “I dissent strongly.” Dave said he had heard Salve requesting the court to refer matters to Constitution benches many times earlier and also sought to know: “Why did your Lordships constitute bigger benches in Justice C S Karnan’s case and Kamini Jaiswal’s case (on the medical college bribery scandal)?”

Salve said political speeches were being made in court. †œThe message that this court sends out should be that this will be just another case, nothing more, nothing less,” he said. As Dave pressed ahead, Salve remarked, “I am not here for a cause, but for a client.” He also suggested that the court start the hearing and if the need arises, at some point in future, refer it to a larger bench. “This case bristles with factual controversy. Someday this question may arise â€" what is the role of mosque in Islam? …When that comes up, if the court feels so, you may refer it to a bigger bench,” he said. “This is not the appropriate time to hear it… If your Lordships say this is so urgent that it must be heard now, then your Lordships must explain why,” said Sibal, drawing a chorus of protests.

Lawyers for the appellants again sought more time to prepare their arguments, saying there were 90,000 pages of oral evidence that needed to be read.

The court finally agreed to give the parties time until February 8. The CJ I, who maintained restraint during the arguments, did, however, say at the end: “Both the sides had a message for this court. But we know what to do. Don’t give a message to this court by telling us what message we will send out.”

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd More Related News
  • Babri demolition 25 years later: VHP, Sena to ‘celebrate’, Muslim group to observe ‘day of sorrow’
    Babri demolition 25 years later: VHP, Sena to ‘celebrate’, Muslim group to observe ‘day of sorrow’
  • Ayodhya land dispute: Solution from heart will be recognised for ages, says Ravi Shankar
    Ayodhya land dispute: Solution from heart will be recognised for ages, says Ravi Shankar
Live Cricket Scores & Results
  • Current
  • Recent
  • Upcoming
  • LIVE India v Sri Lanka Sri Lanka 373 (135.3) & 270/5 (91.0) SL need 140 runs to win
  • LIVE Hong Kong v Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea 3/1 (1.1) PNG need 228 runs in 293 balls at 4.66 rpo
5 December 2017 Afghanistan v Ireland Afghanistan beat Ireland By 138 Runs View All Results 7 December 2017 Afghanistan v Ireland At Sharjah Cricket Association Stadium, Sharjah 16:00 IST Complete Fixtu res Most Read
  • Thugs Of Hindostan: After Mumbai and Malta, Amitabh, Aamir and Fatima shoot in ThailandThugs Of Hindostan: After Mumbai and Malta, Amitabh, Aamir and Fatima shoot in Thailand
  • On Babri anniversary, message from al-Qaeda in Kashmir calls on Indians to join jihadOn Babri anniversary, message from al-Qaeda in Kashmir calls on Indians to join jihad
  • India vs Sri Lanka 3rd Test Day 5 Live Score, Live Cricket Score: Sri Lanka resume after Tea with Dickwella, RoshenIndia vs Sri Lanka 3rd Test Day 5 Live Score, Live Cricket Score: Sri Lanka resume after Tea with Dickwella, Roshen
  • Babri Masjid demolition anniversary LIVE UPDATES: Situation peaceful in AyodhyaBabri Masjid demolition anniversary LIVE UPDATES: Situation peaceful in Ayodhya
Best of Express
  • My brave 11 months old is fighting to live. Please help me save my VeeraBusinessMy brave 11 months old is fighting to live. Please help me save my Veera
  • On Babri anniversary, message from al-Qaeda in Kashmir calls on Indians to join jihadOn Babri anniversary, message from al-Qaeda in Kashmir calls on Indians to join jihad
  • RBI leaves interest rates unchanged at 6 per centBusinessRBI leaves interest rates unchanged at 6 per cent
  • Gujarat election LIVE updates: PM Modi criticises Kapil Sibal, says Congress is linking Ram Mandir with pollsElectionsGujarat election LIVE updates: PM Modi criticises Kapil Sibal, says Congress is linking Ram Mandir with polls
  • Babri demolition assaulted secularism, Hinduism. Consequences are still to play out fullyOpinionBabri demolition assaulted secularism, Hinduis m. Consequences are still to play out fully
  • Only a cooperative effort of the state and community can protect India’s heritageOpinionOnly a cooperative effort of the state and community can protect India’s heritage
Buzzing Now
  • Salman Khan wipes off Tiger Zinda Hai co-actor Katrina Kaif's tears in the sweetest way on Dance ChampionsEntertainmentSalman Khan wipes off Tiger Zinda Hai co-actor Katrina Kaif's tears in the sweetest way on Dance Champions
  • Bharti, Haarsh's 'beautiful part of life' is    on, see first photos post weddingEntertainmentBharti, Haarsh's 'beautiful part of life' is on, see first photos post wedding
  • Shruti Haasan, Michael Corsale and Kamal Haasan attend Aadhav Kannadasan’s wedding festivities, see photosEntertainmentShruti Haasan, Michael Corsale and Kamal Haasan attend Aadhav Kannadasan’s wedding festivities, see photos
  • Mogambo ambush hua: Mumbai Police Twitter handle's punny wa   rning to villains in the city has got Internet buzzingTrendingMogambo ambush hua: Mumbai Police Twitter handle's punny warning to villains in the city has got Internet buzzing
  • 'Mere paas aapka cinema hain': Amul pays a touching tribute to Shashi KapoorTrending'Mere paas aapka cinema hain': Amul pays a touching tribute to Shashi Kapoor
Top News
  • IPL franchises allowed to retain upto five players; CSK, RR player pool definedSportsIPL franchises allowed to retain upto five players; CSK, RR player pool defined
  • PM Narendra Modi's economic advisor says RBI misguided on prices, should cut ratesBusinessPM Narendra Modi's economic advisor says RBI misguided on prices, should cut rates
  • ‘Dubai Duty Free’ EVC and CEO Colm McLoughlin receives honorary doctorate from Middlesex University DubaiBusiness‘Dubai Duty Free’ EVC and CEO Colm McLoughl in receives honorary doctorate from Middlesex University Dubai
  • Unlike Narendra bhai, I am human: Rahul Gandhi admits error in price rise figuresElectionsUnlike Narendra bhai, I am human: Rahul Gandhi admits error in price rise figures
  • India vs Sri Lanka 3rd Test Day 5 LiveSportsIndia vs Sri Lanka 3rd Test Day 5 Live
  • Starc, Hazlewood rattle England; Australia lead Ashes 2-0SportsStarc, Hazlewood rattle England; Australia lead Ashes 2-0
  • Kangana Ranaut teaches how to rock a checkered scarf in styleLifestyleKangana Ranaut teaches how to rock a checkered scarf in style
  • Newly-opened Louvre Abu Dhabi is like Paris’ Musee Du Louvre's siblingLifestyleNewly-opened Louvre Abu Dhabi is like Paris’ Musee Du Louvre's sibling
  • Honor View 10 puts focus on AI with host of new featuresTechnologyHonor View 10 puts focus on AI with host of new features
  • TechnologyAirtel broadband users can get 2000GB data at Rs 3,299: Here's how
Dec 06: Latest News
  • Honor View 10 puts focus on AI with host of new features
  • Yadav faction of JD(U) in Delhi High Court again over Arrow symbol
  • Under Olympic flag, Russia can win medals at 2018 Pyeongchang Games
  • US intention to move Israel embassy sign of ‘incompetence and failure’: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
  • Accenture creates AI-inspired tutorial to bring coding to students in 56 countries
  • Read Next
  • Despite Cyclone Ockhi, ‘wind chill factor’ makes Pune residents feel colder
  • Why crime data do not always add up to the complete picture
  • Gujarat elections: Two Chhotubhai Vasavas, but no prizes for guessing real one

Ananthakrishnan G... read more

  • War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8
  • Babri demolition 25 years later: Cases before Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court
  • Babri demolition 25 years later: How High Court saw answer in split verdict
Source: Google News

COMMENTS

Nama

Accessory,1,Apartment,1,Application,1,Automotive,3,Bank,1,Beauty,2,Board,1,Breakfast,2,Budget Living,1,Building,1,Business,2,Car Accessory,2,Car part,1,Car Shop,1,Celebrity,4,Cloth accessory,1,Cooking,1,Cover,2,Deals,1,Design,3,Digital Life,1,Dinner,1,Dish Review,2,DIY Projects,3,Economy,2,Education,2,Engine,1,Entertainment,1,Expert Advices,2,Fashion,2,Financial,1,Food,3,Football,1,Games,1,Gossip,1,Heath,1,Hotels,1,House,2,Individual,1,Inspiration,2,Latin,1,Lifestyle,6,Live Show,1,Love,1,Lunch,2,Model,1,Music,2,Nutrition,1,Olympic,1,Politics,1,Pop Shop,1,Rock,1,Sports,1,Startup,1,Stock,1,Tech Review,1,Tech Tips,1,Technology,2,Tennis,1,Tone Set,1,Travel,1,Trip Ideas,1,Vogue,1,Weather,1,Wedding,1,World,3,
ltr
item
Netizen 24 India: Netizen 24 IND: War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8
Netizen 24 IND: War of words in Supreme Court over timing of Ayodhya hearing, next date February 8
http://s0.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/plugins/lazy-load-0.7/images/1x1.trans.gif?m=1501797545h
Netizen 24 India
http://www.india.netizen24.com/2017/12/netizen-24-ind-war-of-words-in-supreme.html
http://www.india.netizen24.com/
http://www.india.netizen24.com/
http://www.india.netizen24.com/2017/12/netizen-24-ind-war-of-words-in-supreme.html
true
5433794195654824048
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy